lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 11/11] arm64: scs: add shadow stacks for SDEI
From
Date
Hi Sami,

On 12/02/2020 20:59, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:57 AM James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> wrote:
>> On 28/01/2020 18:49, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
>>> This change adds per-CPU shadow call stacks for the SDEI handler.
>>> Similarly to how the kernel stacks are handled, we add separate shadow
>>> stacks for normal and critical events.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
>> Tested-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>

>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/scs.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/scs.c
>>> index eaadf5430baa..dddb7c56518b 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/scs.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/scs.c
>>
>>> +static int scs_alloc_percpu(unsigned long * __percpu *ptr, int cpu)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned long *p;
>>> +
>>> + p = __vmalloc_node_range(PAGE_SIZE, SCS_SIZE,
>>> + VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END,
>>> + GFP_SCS, PAGE_KERNEL,
>>> + 0, cpu_to_node(cpu),
>>> + __builtin_return_address(0));
>>
>> (What makes this arch specific? arm64 has its own calls like this for the regular vmap
>> stacks because it plays tricks with the alignment. Here the alignment requirement comes
>> from the core SCS code... Would another architecture implement these
>> scs_alloc_percpu()/scs_free_percpu() differently?)
>
> You are correct, these aren't necessarily specific to arm64. However,
> right now, we are not allocating per-CPU shadow stacks anywhere else,
> so this was a natural place for the helper functions.

Fair enough,


> Would you prefer me to move these to kernel/scs.c instead?

I have no preference, as long as they don't get duplicated later!


Thanks,

James

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-14 19:14    [W:0.174 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site