lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v3 3/3] PCI: hv: Introduce hv_msi_entry
Date
> From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2020 11:14 PM
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 04:18:01AM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> > > From: linux-hyperv-owner@vger.kernel.org
> > > <linux-hyperv-owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Boqun Feng
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h
> > > b/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h
> > >
> > > +union hv_msi_entry {
> > > + u64 as_uint64;
> > > + struct {
> > > + u32 address;
> > > + u32 data;
> > > + } __packed;
> > > +};
> >
> > Just a small thing: should we move the __packed to after the "}" of
> > the union hv_msi_entry ?
> >
>
> Actually, in TLFS header, it's common to put the "__packed" inside the
> union, rather than after the union. It makes sense because union is
> different than struct: the alignment requirement of a union is already
> decided by the "as_*" member, so no need for "__packed" attribute.
>
> Regards,
> Boqun

I see. Thanks for the explanation!

Thanks,
-- Dexuan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-13 09:06    [W:0.041 / U:24.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site