lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/28] PM: QoS: Get rid of unuseful code and rework CPU latency QoS interface
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 9:09 AM Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net> wrote:
>
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 1:16 AM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:31 AM Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net> wrote:
> >> >

[cut]

> >
> > And BTW, posting patches as RFC is fine even if they have not been
> > tested. At least you let people know that you work on something this
> > way, so if they work on changes in the same area, they may take that
> > into consideration.
> >
>
> Sure, that was going to be the first RFC.
>
> > Also if there are objections to your proposal, you may save quite a
> > bit of time by sending it early.
> >
> > It is unfortunate that this series has clashed with the changes that
> > you were about to propose, but in this particular case in my view it
> > is better to clean up things and start over.
> >
>
> Luckily it doesn't clash with the second RFC I was meaning to send,
> maybe we should just skip the first?

Yes, please.

> Or maybe it's valuable as a curiosity anyway?

No, let's just focus on the latest one.

Thanks!

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-13 12:38    [W:0.064 / U:53.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site