lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: arm,scmi: add smc/hvc transports
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:58:49AM +0800, peng.fan@nxp.com wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> SCMI could use SMC/HVC as tranports. Since there is no
> standardized id, we need to use vendor specific id. So
> add into devicetree binding doc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> index f493d69e6194..dacc62dc248b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ The scmi node with the following properties shall be under the /firmware/ node.
> protocol identifier for a given sub-node.
> - #size-cells : should be '0' as 'reg' property doesn't have any size
> associated with it.
> +- smc-id : SMC id required when using smc or hvc transports

IIUC, "arm,smc-id" is preferred more.

Why did you drop "arm,scmi-smc" ?

--
Regards,
Sudeep

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-13 11:54    [W:0.051 / U:4.756 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site