[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [tip: core/objtool] objtool: Fail the kernel build on fatal errors
Josh Poimboeuf <> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:47:38PM -0000, tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>> The following commit has been merged into the core/objtool branch of tip:
>> Commit-ID: 644592d328370af4b3e027b7b1ae9f81613782d8
>> Gitweb:
>> Author: Josh Poimboeuf <>
>> AuthorDate: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:32:38 -06:00
>> Committer: Borislav Petkov <>
>> CommitterDate: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:27:03 +01:00
>> objtool: Fail the kernel build on fatal errors
>> When objtool encounters a fatal error, it usually means the binary is
>> corrupt or otherwise broken in some way. Up until now, such errors were
>> just treated as warnings which didn't fail the kernel build.
>> However, objtool is now stable enough that if a fatal error is
>> discovered, it most likely means something is seriously wrong and it
>> should fail the kernel build.
>> Note that this doesn't apply to "normal" objtool warnings; only fatal
>> ones.
> Clang still has some toolchain issues which need to be sorted out, so
> upgrading the fatal errors is causing their CI to fail.

Good. Last time we made it fail they just fixed their stuff.

> So I think we need to drop this one for now.

Why? It's our decision to define which level of toolchain brokeness is

> Boris, are you able to just drop it or should I send a revert?

I really want to see a revert which has a proper justification why the
issues of clang are tolerable along with a clear statement when this
fatal error will come back. And 'when' means a date, not 'when clang is



 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-14 01:11    [W:0.042 / U:5.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site