lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 24/28] sound: Call cpu_latency_qos_*() instead of pm_qos_*()
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:34:15AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Call cpu_latency_qos_add/update/remove_request() and
> cpu_latency_qos_request_active() instead of
> pm_qos_add/update/remove_request() and pm_qos_request_active(),
> respectively, because the latter are going to be dropped.

What's the story with dependencies here, I only have this patch and not
the cover letter?
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-12 11:08    [W:0.542 / U:2.452 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site