Messages in this thread | | | From | Pavel Begunkov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/5] io_uring: fix reassigning work.task_pid from io-wq | Date | Tue, 11 Feb 2020 23:57:13 +0300 |
| |
On 11/02/2020 23:21, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 2/11/20 1:01 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote: >> If a request got into io-wq context, io_prep_async_work() has already >> been called. Most of the stuff there is idempotent with an exception >> that it'll set work.task_pid to task_pid_vnr() of an io_wq worker thread >> >> Do only what's needed, that's io_prep_linked_timeout() and setting >> IO_WQ_WORK_UNBOUND. > > Rest of the series aside, I'm going to fix-up the pid addition to > only set if it's zero like the others.
IMO, io_req_work_grab_env() should never be called from io-wq. It'd do nothing good but open space for subtle bugs. And if that's enforced (as done in this patch), it's safe to set @pid multiple times.
Probably, it worth to add the check just to not go through task_pid_vnr() several times.
-- Pavel Begunkov
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |