lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC] why can't dynamic isolation just like the static way
From
Date


On 2020/2/11 下午7:43, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 04:17:34PM +0800, 王贇 wrote:
>> Hi, folks
>>
>> We are dealing with isolcpus these days and try to do the isolation
>> dynamically.
>>
>> The kernel doc lead us into the cpuset.sched_load_balance, it's fine
>> to achieve the dynamic isolation with it, however we got problem with
>> the systemd stuff.
>
> Then don't use systemd :-) Also, if systemd is the problem, why are you
> bugging us?

Well, that's... fair enough :-P

What we try to understand is why dynamic isolation is so different with
the way of static isolation, is it not good to have a simple way instead?

Regards,
Michael Wang

>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-12 02:31    [W:0.085 / U:4.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site