lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] staging: greybus: audio: Add missing unlock in gbaudio_dapm_free_controls()
From
Date

在 2020/12/4 16:40, Johan Hovold 写道:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:13:50AM +0800, Wang Hai wrote:
>> Add the missing unlock before return from function
>> gbaudio_dapm_free_controls() in the error handling case.
>>
>> Fixes: 510e340efe0c ("staging: greybus: audio: Add helper APIs for dynamic audio module")
>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/greybus/audio_helper.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_helper.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_helper.c
>> index 237531ba60f3..293675dbea10 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_helper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_helper.c
>> @@ -135,6 +135,7 @@ int gbaudio_dapm_free_controls(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
>> if (!w) {
>> dev_err(dapm->dev, "%s: widget not found\n",
>> widget->name);
>> + mutex_unlock(&dapm->card->dapm_mutex);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> widget++;
> This superficially looks correct, but there seems to be another bug in
> this function. It can be used free an array of widgets, but if one of
> them isn't found we just leak the rest. Perhaps that return should
> rather be "widget++; continue;".
>
I think this is a good idea, should I send a v2 patch?
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-12-04 10:23    [W:0.495 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site