lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Dec]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: Fix schema warnings for pwm-leds
    On Thu, 31 Dec 2020, Pavel Machek wrote:

    > Hi!
    >
    > > > > The node names for devices using the pwm-leds driver follow a certain
    > > > > naming scheme (now). Parent node name is not enforced, but recommended
    > > > > by DT project.
    > > > >
    > > > > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml
    > > > > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml
    > > > > /home/alex/build/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/iqs62x.example.dt.yaml: pwmleds: 'panel' does not match any of the regexes: '^led(-[0-9a-f]+)?$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
    > > > > From schema: /home/alex/src/linux/leds/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pwm.yaml
    > > > >
    > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl <post@lespocky.de>
    > > > > Acked-by: Jeff LaBundy <jeff@labundy.com>
    > > > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
    > > >
    > > > Thanks, applied.
    > >
    > > Sorry, what?
    > >
    > > Applied to what tree?
    >
    > I took it to (local copy) of leds-next tree on. But now I realised it
    > is mfd, not a LED patch, so I undone that. Sorry for the confusion.
    >
    > Anyway, patch still looks good to me:
    >
    > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

    Thanks Pavel.

    I plan on taking this next week.

    --
    Lee Jones [李琼斯]
    Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
    Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
    Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2020-12-31 13:20    [W:5.258 / U:4.608 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site