lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] x86/sev-es: Fix not using prefixes.nbytes for loop over prefixes.bytes
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 11:07:26 -0800
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 09:31:57AM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > On 12/2/20 2:51 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > Since the insn.prefixes.nbytes can be bigger than the size of
> > > insn.prefixes.bytes[] when a same prefix is repeated, we have to
> > > check whether the insn.prefixes.bytes[i] != 0 and i < 4 instead
> > > of insn.prefixes.nbytes.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 25189d08e516 ("x86/sev-es: Add support for handling IOIO exceptions")
> > > Reported-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev-es.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev-es.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev-es.c
> > > index 954cb2702e23..6a7a3027c9ac 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev-es.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev-es.c
> > > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static bool insn_has_rep_prefix(struct insn *insn)
> > > insn_get_prefixes(insn);
> > > - for (i = 0; i < insn->prefixes.nbytes; i++) {
> > > + for (i = 0; insn->prefixes.bytes[i] && i < 4; i++) {
>
> You must test "i" before bytes[i] or you still do the out-of-bounds-read.

Oops, thanks.

>
> >
> > Wouldn't it be better to create a #define for the size rather than hard
> > coding 4 in the various files? That would protect everything should the
> > bytes array size ever change in the future.
>
> Agreed, and perhaps instead of repeating the idiom in the for loop, add
> a helper like:
>
> #define insn_prefix_valid(prefixes, i) (i >=0 && i < 4 && prefixes->bytes[i])
>
> to be used like:
>
> for (i = 0; insn_prefix_valid(&insn->prefixes, i); i++) {

Hm, for all of these usage, they are looping on the prefixes, so

for_each_insn_prefix(insn, idx, prefix) {
...
}

will be simpler.

Thank you,

>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Tom
> >
> > > insn_byte_t p = insn->prefixes.bytes[i];
> > > if (p == 0xf2 || p == 0xf3)
> > >
>
> --
> Kees Cook


--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-12-03 03:04    [W:0.070 / U:0.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site