Messages in this thread | | | From | Miguel Ojeda <> | Date | Thu, 3 Dec 2020 01:09:11 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] userfaultfd: selftests: make __{s,u}64 format specifiers portable |
| |
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 12:55 AM Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> wrote: > > This is what clang-format yields. Are you thinking it would be better > to line everything up with the ( in uffd_error( ?
Yeah, sometimes clang-format cannot do a good job with the 80 column limit + 8 tabs.
You are definitely not forced to follow clang-format output by any means. Subsystem maintainers decide what style they prefer anyway, which could range from a manual approach to following clang-format strictly. Clang-format implements the general kernel style as closely as we could get it so far (it will improve more in the future when we raise the minimum clang-format version required). See Doc/process/clang-format.rst.
> Or, perhaps this case is a good reason to make uffd_error() a variadic > macro so we can insert "-EEXIST" || "error" with a "%s".
...and indeed, sometimes it is a hint that simplifying things could help :-)
Cheers, Miguel
| |