lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 seccomp 5/5] seccomp/cache: Report cache data through /proc/pid/seccomp_cache
Hi Yifei,

On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 8:08 PM YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei1999@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@illinois.edu>
>
> Currently the kernel does not provide an infrastructure to translate
> architecture numbers to a human-readable name. Translating syscall
> numbers to syscall names is possible through FTRACE_SYSCALL
> infrastructure but it does not provide support for compat syscalls.
>
> This will create a file for each PID as /proc/pid/seccomp_cache.
> The file will be empty when no seccomp filters are loaded, or be
> in the format of:
> <arch name> <decimal syscall number> <ALLOW | FILTER>
> where ALLOW means the cache is guaranteed to allow the syscall,
> and filter means the cache will pass the syscall to the BPF filter.
>
> For the docker default profile on x86_64 it looks like:
> x86_64 0 ALLOW
> x86_64 1 ALLOW
> x86_64 2 ALLOW
> x86_64 3 ALLOW
> [...]
> x86_64 132 ALLOW
> x86_64 133 ALLOW
> x86_64 134 FILTER
> x86_64 135 FILTER
> x86_64 136 FILTER
> x86_64 137 ALLOW
> x86_64 138 ALLOW
> x86_64 139 FILTER
> x86_64 140 ALLOW
> x86_64 141 ALLOW
> [...]
>
> This file is guarded by CONFIG_SECCOMP_CACHE_DEBUG with a default
> of N because I think certain users of seccomp might not want the
> application to know which syscalls are definitely usable. For
> the same reason, it is also guarded by CAP_SYS_ADMIN.
>
> Suggested-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAG48ez3Ofqp4crXGksLmZY6=fGrF_tWyUCg7PBkAetvbbOPeOA@mail.gmail.com/
> Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <yifeifz2@illinois.edu>

> @@ -2311,3 +2314,59 @@ static int __init seccomp_sysctl_init(void)
> device_initcall(seccomp_sysctl_init)
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_SYSCTL */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_CACHE_DEBUG
> +/* Currently CONFIG_SECCOMP_CACHE_DEBUG implies SECCOMP_ARCH_NATIVE */

Should there be a dependency on SECCOMP_ARCH_NATIVE?
Should all architectures that implement seccomp have this?

E.g. mips does select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER, but doesn't
have SECCOMP_ARCH_NATIVE?

(noticed with preliminary out-of-tree seccomp implementation for m68k,
which doesn't have SECCOMP_ARCH_NATIVE

> +static void proc_pid_seccomp_cache_arch(struct seq_file *m, const char *name,
> + const void *bitmap, size_t bitmap_size)
> +{
> + int nr;
> +
> + for (nr = 0; nr < bitmap_size; nr++) {
> + bool cached = test_bit(nr, bitmap);
> + char *status = cached ? "ALLOW" : "FILTER";
> +
> + seq_printf(m, "%s %d %s\n", name, nr, status);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +int proc_pid_seccomp_cache(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> + struct pid *pid, struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + struct seccomp_filter *f;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + /*
> + * We don't want some sandboxed process to know what their seccomp
> + * filters consist of.
> + */
> + if (!file_ns_capable(m->file, &init_user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + return -EACCES;
> +
> + if (!lock_task_sighand(task, &flags))
> + return -ESRCH;
> +
> + f = READ_ONCE(task->seccomp.filter);
> + if (!f) {
> + unlock_task_sighand(task, &flags);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* prevent filter from being freed while we are printing it */
> + __get_seccomp_filter(f);
> + unlock_task_sighand(task, &flags);
> +
> + proc_pid_seccomp_cache_arch(m, SECCOMP_ARCH_NATIVE_NAME,
> + f->cache.allow_native,

error: ‘struct action_cache’ has no member named ‘allow_native’

struct action_cache is empty if SECCOMP_ARCH_NATIVE is not
defined (so there are checks for it).

> + SECCOMP_ARCH_NATIVE_NR);
> +
> +#ifdef SECCOMP_ARCH_COMPAT
> + proc_pid_seccomp_cache_arch(m, SECCOMP_ARCH_COMPAT_NAME,
> + f->cache.allow_compat,
> + SECCOMP_ARCH_COMPAT_NR);
> +#endif /* SECCOMP_ARCH_COMPAT */
> +
> + __put_seccomp_filter(f);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SECCOMP_CACHE_DEBUG */
> --
> 2.28.0
>


--
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-12-17 13:17    [W:0.220 / U:11.352 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site