lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Dec]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] modpost: refactor error handling and clarify error/fatal difference
On Tuesday 01 Dec 2020 at 19:34:15 (+0900), Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> We have 3 log functions. fatal() is special because it lets modpost bail
> out immediately. The difference between warn() and error() is the only
> prefix parts ("WARNING:" vs "ERROR:").
>
> The intended usage of error() is probably to propagate the return code
> from the function to the exit code of modpost, as check_exports() etc.
> already does. This is a good manner because we should display as many
> issues as possible in a single run of modpost.
>
> What is annoying about fatal() is that it kills modpost at the first
> error. People would need to run Kbuild again and again until they fix
> all errors.
>
> But, unfortunately, people tend to do:
> "This case should not be allowed. Let's replace warn() with fatal()."

Indeed :-)

> One of the reasons is probably it is tedious to manually carry the error
> code back to the main() function.

And yes, that was the reason.

> This commit refactors error() so any single call for it automatically
> makes modpost return the error code.
>
> I also added comments in modpost.h for warn(), error(), and fatal().
>
> Again, please use fatal() only when you have a strong reason to do so.
> For example:
>
> - Memory shortage (i.e. malloc() etc. has failed)
> - The ELF file is broken, and there is no point to continue parsing
> - Something really odd has happened
>
> For general coding errors, please use error().
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>

I gave it a go and the error is propagated correctly, so FWIW:

Tested-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>

Thanks,
Quentin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-12-01 17:50    [W:0.077 / U:0.212 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site