lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the amdgpu tree
Hi all,

On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 14:21:08 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>
> between commit:
>
> e8a982355f96 ("drm/amd/display: Add tracepoint for amdgpu_dm")
>
> from the amdgpu tree and commit:
>
> 29b77ad7b9ca ("drm/atomic: Pass the full state to CRTC atomic_check")
>
> from the drm-misc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> index 28dcaae06993,86fd4420f128..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> @@@ -6003,19 -5514,19 +6003,21 @@@ static void dm_update_crtc_active_plane
> }
>
> static int dm_crtc_helper_atomic_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> - struct drm_crtc_state *state)
> + struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> {
> + struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state,
> + crtc);
> struct amdgpu_device *adev = drm_to_adev(crtc->dev);
> struct dc *dc = adev->dm.dc;
> - struct dm_crtc_state *dm_crtc_state = to_dm_crtc_state(state);
> + struct dm_crtc_state *dm_crtc_state = to_dm_crtc_state(crtc_state);
> int ret = -EINVAL;
>
> - trace_amdgpu_dm_crtc_atomic_check(state);
> ++ trace_amdgpu_dm_crtc_atomic_check(crtc_state);
> +
> - dm_update_crtc_active_planes(crtc, state);
> + dm_update_crtc_active_planes(crtc, crtc_state);
>
> if (unlikely(!dm_crtc_state->stream &&
> - modeset_required(state, NULL, dm_crtc_state->stream))) {
> + modeset_required(crtc_state, NULL, dm_crtc_state->stream))) {
> WARN_ON(1);
> return ret;
> }

This is now a conflict between the drm tree and the amdgpu tree.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-09 03:17    [W:0.073 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site