lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH bpf-next v5 8/9] bpf: Add tests for task_local_storage
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 3:14 AM Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 10:58:26PM +0000, KP Singh wrote:
> > +
> > + ret = copy_file_range(fd_in, NULL, fd_out, NULL, stat.st_size, 0);
>
> centos7 glibc doesn't have it.
>
> /prog_tests/test_local_storage.c:59:8: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘copy_file_range’; did you mean ‘sync_file_range’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 59 | ret = copy_file_range(fd_in, NULL, fd_out, NULL, stat.st_size, 0);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | sync_file_range
> BINARY test_progs
> BINARY test_progs-no_alu32
> ld: test_local_storage.test.o: in function `copy_rm':
> test_local_storage.c:59: undefined reference to `copy_file_range'
>
> Could you use something else or wrap it similar to pidfd_open ?

Sure, I created a wrapper similar to pidfd_open and sent out a v6.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-06 11:40    [W:0.054 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site