lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [RESEND PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: connector: add power-opmode optional property to usb-connector
Hi Rob and Amelie,

With regards to discussions in this thread,
For https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201020093627.256885-2-badhri@google.com,
I can send in a patch to update the new-source-frs-typec-current property.
Amelie, If you are already planning to send that I am fine with that as well.
Let me know !

To summarize the changes for new-source-frs-typec-current would be,
1. Rename to frs-new-source-opmode
2. Use string values instead of u32 similar to typec-power-opmode.
Are these correct ?

Thanks,
Badhri

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 7:55 AM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 6:24 AM Jun Li <lijun.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com> 于2020年11月5日周四 下午7:36写道:
> > >
> > > On 11/4/20 10:08 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 04:27:14PM +0100, Amelie DELAUNAY wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 10/30/20 3:29 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > >>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:49 AM Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@st.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On 10/29/20 4:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > >>>>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:58:03AM +0100, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
> > > >>>>>> Power operation mode may depends on hardware design, so, add the optional
> > > >>>>>> property power-opmode for usb-c connector to select the power operation
> > > >>>>>> mode capability.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
> > > >>>>>> ---
> > > >>>>>> .../bindings/connector/usb-connector.yaml | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > >>>>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.yaml
> > > >>>>>> index 728f82db073d..200d19c60fd5 100644
> > > >>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.yaml
> > > >>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.yaml
> > > >>>>>> @@ -93,6 +93,24 @@ properties:
> > > >>>>>> - device
> > > >>>>>> - dual
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> + power-opmode:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I've acked this version:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201020093627.256885-2-badhri@google.com
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> frs is used for Fast Role Swap defined in USB PD spec.
> > > >>>> I understand it allows to get the same information but I'm wondering why
> > > >>>> the property name is limited to -frs- in this case. What about a
> > > >>>> non-power delivery USB-C connector ?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I've got no idea. The folks that know USB-C and PD details need to get
> > > >>> together and work all this out. To me, it looks like the same thing...
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> It looks but...
> > > >>
> > > >> The purpose of power-opmode property is to configure the USB-C controllers,
> > > >> especially the non-PD USB-C controllers to determine the power operation
> > > >> mode that the Type C connector will support and will advertise through CC
> > > >> pins when it has no power delivery support, whatever the power role: Sink,
> > > >> Source or Dual
> > > >> The management of the property is the same that data-role and power-role
> > > >> properties, and done by USB Type-C Connector Class.
> > > >>
> > > >> new-source-frs-typec-current specifies initial current capability of the new
> > > >> source when vSafe5V is applied during PD3.0 Fast Role Swap. So here, this
> > > >> property is not applied at usb-c controller configuration level, but during
> > > >> PD Fast Role Swap, so when the Sink become the Source.
> > > >> Moreover, the related driver code says FRS can only be supported by DRP
> > > >> ports. So new-source-frs-typec-current property, in addition to being
> > > >> specific to PD, is also dedicated to DRP usb-c controller.
> > > >> The property is managed by Type-C Port Controller Manager for PD.
> > > >
> > > > But it's the same set of possible values, right? So we can align the
> > > > values at least.
> > > >
> > >
> > > USB Power Delivery FRS values are defined in
> > > include/dt-bindings/usb/pd.h
> >
> > I think this can be changed if both can be aligned.
> >
> > >to fit with drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> > > frs_typec_current enum.
> > >
> > > USB-C power operation mode values are defined in
> > > include/linux/usb/typec.h with typec_pwr_opmode enum and matching with
> > > string values of typec_pwr_opmodes tab.
> > >
> > > USB PD requires USB-C.
> > > USB-C doesn't requires USB PD.
> > >
> > > drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c already used typec_pwr_opmode values.
> > >
> > > USB PD specification Table 6-14 Fixed Supply PDO says:
> > > Fast Role Swap required USB Type-C Current (see also [USB Type-C 2.0]):
> > > Value | Description
> > > 00b | Fast Swap not supported (default)
> > > 01b | Default USB Power
> > > 10b | 1.5A @ 5V
> > > 11b | 3.0A @ 5V
> >
> > This is the value in PDO of sink, the FRS property value(or after translated)
> > actually is used to compare with above value.
> >
> > So I think both properties can share the same "value", maybe string
> > like below
> >
> > 10 static const char * const typec_pwr_opmodes[] = {
> > 11 [TYPEC_PWR_MODE_USB] = "default",
> > 12 [TYPEC_PWR_MODE_1_5A] = "1.5A",
> > 13 [TYPEC_PWR_MODE_3_0A] = "3.0A",
> >
> > >
> > > Note the *see also USB Type-C 2.0*.
> > >
> > > USB Type-C specification 4.6.2.1 USB Type-C Current says:
> > > The USB Type-C connector uses CC pins for configuration including an
> > > ability for a Source to advertise to its port partner (Sink) the amount
> > > of current it shall supply:
> > > • Default is the as-configured for high-power operation current value as
> > > defined by the USB Specification (500 mA for USB 2.0 ports; 900 mA or
> > > 1,500 mA for USB 3.2 ports in single-lane or dual-lane operation,
> > > respectively)
> > > • 1.5 A
> > > • 3.0 A
> > >
> > > > Can we align the names in some way? power-opmode and frs-source-opmode
> > > > or ??
> >
> > how about typec-power-opmode and frs-new-source-opmode
>
> Sure.
>
> >
> > > >
> > >
> > > I let USB PD specialists answer.
> > >
> > > *frs* property fits with USB PD specification, so with USB PD protocol.
> > > *power-opmode fits with USB Type-C specification, so with USB-C hardware
> > > support.
> > >
> > > > Are these 2 properties mutually exclusive?
> >
> > I think yes.
>
> This should work to express that:
>
> allOf:
> - not:
> required:
> - typec-power-opmode
> - frs-new-source-opmode
>
> Rob

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-06 04:12    [W:0.567 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site