lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Pinning ZONE_MOVABLE pages
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020, Pavel Tatashin wrote:

> Recently, I encountered a hang that is happening during memory hot
> remove operation. It turns out that the hang is caused by pinned user
> pages in ZONE_MOVABLE.
>
> Kernel expects that all pages in ZONE_MOVABLE can be migrated, but
> this is not the case if a user applications such as through dpdk
> libraries pinned them via vfio dma map. Kernel keeps trying to
> hot-remove them, but refcnt never gets to zero, so we are looping
> until the hardware watchdog kicks in.
>
> We cannot do dma unmaps before hot-remove, because hot-remove is a
> slow operation, and we have thousands for network flows handled by
> dpdk that we just cannot suspend for the duration of hot-remove
> operation.
>
> The solution is for dpdk to allocate pages from a zone below
> ZONE_MOVAVLE, i.e. ZONE_NORMAL/ZONE_HIGHMEM, but this is not possible.
> There is no user interface that we have that allows applications to
> select what zone the memory should come from.
>
> I've spoken with Stephen Hemminger, and he said that DPDK is moving in
> the direction of using transparent huge pages instead of HugeTLBs,
> which means that we need to allow at least anonymous, and anonymous
> transparent huge pages to come from non-movable zones on demand.
>

I'd like to know more about this use case, ZONE_MOVABLE is typically a
great way to optimize for thp availability because, absent memory pinning,
this memory can always be defragmented. So the idea is that DPDK will now
allocate all of its thp from ZONE_NORMAL or only a small subset? Seems
like an invitation for oom kill if the sizing of ZONE_NORMAL is
insufficient.

> Here is what I am proposing:
> 1. Add a new flag that is passed through pin_user_pages_* down to
> fault handlers, and allow the fault handler to allocate from a
> non-movable zone.
>
> Sample function stacks through which this info needs to be passed is this:
>
> pin_user_pages_remote(gup_flags)
> __get_user_pages_remote(gup_flags)
> __gup_longterm_locked(gup_flags)
> __get_user_pages_locked(gup_flags)
> __get_user_pages(gup_flags)
> faultin_page(gup_flags)
> Convert gup_flags into fault_flags
> handle_mm_fault(fault_flags)
>
> From handle_mm_fault(), the stack diverges into various faults,
> examples include:
>
> Transparent Huge Page
> handle_mm_fault(fault_flags)
> __handle_mm_fault(fault_flags)
> Create: struct vm_fault vmf, use fault_flags to specify correct gfp_mask
> create_huge_pmd(vmf);
> do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(vmf);
> mm_get_huge_zero_page(vma->vm_mm); -> flag is lost, so flag from
> vmf.gfp_mask should be passed as well.
>
> There are several other similar paths in a transparent huge page, also
> there is a named path where allocation is based on filesystems, and
> the flag should be honored there as well, but it does not have to be
> added at the same time.
>
> Regular Pages
> handle_mm_fault(fault_flags)
> __handle_mm_fault(fault_flags)
> Create: struct vm_fault vmf, use fault_flags to specify correct gfp_mask
> handle_pte_fault(vmf)
> do_anonymous_page(vmf);
> page = alloc_zeroed_user_highpage_movable(vma, vmf->address); ->
> replace change this call according to gfp_mask.
>

This would likely be useful for AMD SEV as well, which requires guest
pages to be pinned because the encryption algorithm depends on the host
physical address. This ensures that plaintext memory for two pages don't
result in the same ciphertext.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-22 22:09    [W:0.127 / U:12.876 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site