lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/9] platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem
From
Date
On 11/19/20 4:54 PM, Barnabás Pőcze wrote:
> Hi

[...]

>>>> +enum ssam_ssh_tc {
>>>> + /* Known SSH/EC target categories. */
>>>> + // category 0x00 is invalid for EC use
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_SAM = 0x01, // generic system functionality, real-time clock
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_BAT = 0x02, // battery/power subsystem
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_TMP = 0x03, // thermal subsystem
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_PMC = 0x04,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_FAN = 0x05,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_PoM = 0x06,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_DBG = 0x07,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_KBD = 0x08, // legacy keyboard (Laptop 1/2)
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_FWU = 0x09,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_UNI = 0x0a,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_LPC = 0x0b,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_TCL = 0x0c,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_SFL = 0x0d,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_KIP = 0x0e,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_EXT = 0x0f,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_BLD = 0x10,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_BAS = 0x11, // detachment system (Surface Book 2/3)
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_SEN = 0x12,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_SRQ = 0x13,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_MCU = 0x14,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_HID = 0x15, // generic HID input subsystem
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_TCH = 0x16,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_BKL = 0x17,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_TAM = 0x18,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_ACC = 0x19,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_UFI = 0x1a,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_USC = 0x1b,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_PEN = 0x1c,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_VID = 0x1d,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_AUD = 0x1e,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_SMC = 0x1f,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_KPD = 0x20,
>>>> + SSAM_SSH_TC_REG = 0x21,
>>>> +};
>>>
>>> Is it known what these abbreviations stand for? Maybe I missed them?
>>
>> The comments state all we really know about these (through observation
>> and experimentation). The table itself has been extracted from the
>> Windows driver, but the abbreviations and values are all we're getting
>> from it.
>
> I see, thanks for the clarification. For some reason, I believed the
> "Known SSH/EC target categories" comment means that those are known, as in,
> it is known what they are for, etc., not just the abbreviation.

Right, that can be misunderstood, sorry. It's probably best if I add a
comment explaining that in a bit more detail and noting where those
values and abbreviations come from.

Thanks,
Max

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-19 18:39    [W:0.408 / U:0.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site