lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] mfd: syscon: Add syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_optional() function.
From
Date


On 17/11/2020 17:40, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 5:07 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>> On 17/11/2020 13:37, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 17 Nov 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>>
>>> If you want to go the route for me rebasing my tree on top of for-mfd-next
>>> then I'd like to have at least a stable tag, so that it will be easier to
>>> provide the pull-request later on. Would that be a compromise?
>>
>> I don't usually provide immutable branches/tags unless I'm sharing
>> topic branches for other maintainers to pick-up, in order to avoid
>> merge conflicts.
>
> I think that's what Matthias is planning to do though. If he wants
> to send me a Mediatek specific branch for the soc tree, it needs to
> be based on a stable commit in the mtd tree to avoid duplicating
> the commit.
>

Exactly, I'm the maintainer of MediaTek SoCs and I would need to pull this patch
into my tree to be able to accept the series I mentioned [1]. Can you provide me
a stable tag/branch, against just that patch or against your whole tree?

Regards,
Matthias

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20201030113622.201188-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-18 15:57    [W:0.060 / U:3.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site