lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next v4] net: linux/skbuff.h: combine SKB_EXTENSIONS + KCOV handling
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
> On 11/16/20 7:30 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 15:31:21 +0100 Florian Westphal wrote:
> >>>> @@ -4151,12 +4150,11 @@ enum skb_ext_id {
> >>>> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MPTCP)
> >>>> SKB_EXT_MPTCP,
> >>>> #endif
> >>>> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KCOV)
> >>>> SKB_EXT_KCOV_HANDLE,
> >>>> -#endif
> >>>
> >>> I don't think we should remove this #ifdef: the number of extensions are
> >>> currently limited to 8, we might not want to always have KCOV there even if
> >>> we don't want it. I think adding items in this enum only when needed was the
> >>> intension of Florian (+cc) when creating these SKB extensions.
> >>> Also, this will increase a tiny bit some structures, see "struct skb_ext()".
> >>
> >> Yes, I would also prefer to retrain the ifdef.
> >>
> >> Another reason was to make sure that any skb_ext_add(..., MY_EXT) gives
> >> a compile error if the extension is not enabled.
> >
> > Oh well, sorry for taking you down the wrong path Randy!
>
> No problem.
> So we are back to v2, right?

Yes, you can still drop the line

>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KCOV) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SKB_EXTENSIONS)

for enum skb_ext_id (alreadyt under SKB_EXTENSIONS).

Other than that v2 looks good to me.

Thanks!

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-16 18:17    [W:0.046 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site