Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Alex Shi <> | Subject | [PATCH 2/6] timekeeping: add missed kernel-doc marks for 'tkf' | Date | Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:24:31 +0800 |
| |
Fix the kernel-doc markup and remove the following warning: kernel/time/timekeeping.c:415: warning: Function parameter or member 'tkf' not described in 'update_fast_timekeeper' kernel/time/timekeeping.c:464: warning: Function parameter or member 'tkf' not described in '__ktime_get_fast_ns'
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c index daa0ff017819..d0f7cd1b8823 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c @@ -399,6 +399,7 @@ static inline u64 timekeeping_cycles_to_ns(const struct tk_read_base *tkr, u64 c /** * update_fast_timekeeper - Update the fast and NMI safe monotonic timekeeper. * @tkr: Timekeeping readout base from which we take the update + * @tkf: NMI safe timekeeper * * We want to use this from any context including NMI and tracing / * instrumenting the timekeeping code itself. @@ -430,6 +431,7 @@ static void update_fast_timekeeper(const struct tk_read_base *tkr, /** * ktime_get_mono_fast_ns - Fast NMI safe access to clock monotonic + * @tkf: NMI safe timekeeper * * This timestamp is not guaranteed to be monotonic across an update. * The timestamp is calculated by: -- 2.29.GIT
| |