lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [net-next,v2,4/5] seg6: add support for the SRv6 End.DT4 behavior
Hi Jakub,

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 13:40:10 -0800
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:40:36 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > agreed. The v6 variant has existed for a while. The v4 version is
> > > independent.
> >
> > Okay, I'm not sure what's the right call so I asked DaveM.
>
> DaveM raised a concern that unless we implement v6 now we can't be sure
> the interface we create for v4 is going to fit there.
>
> So Andrea unless it's a major hurdle, could you take a stab at the v6
> version with VRFs as part of this series?

I can tackle the v6 version but how do we face the compatibility issue raised
by Stefano in his message?

if it is ok to implement a uAPI that breaks the existing scripts, it is relatively
easy to replicate the VRF-based approach also in v6.

Waiting for your advice!

Thanks,
Andrea

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-14 00:02    [W:0.047 / U:0.568 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site