lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: spmi: document binding for the Mediatek SPMI controller
From
Date
Quoting Hsin-Hsiung Wang (2020-10-15 05:59:07)
> This adds documentation for the SPMI controller found on Mediatek SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>

I don't know what's going on but my MUA sees a bunch of CRLF line
endings in these patches.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..39459ca2e0da
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Mediatek SPMI Controller Device Tree Bindings
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> + - Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>

Is there someone at mediatek who can be the maintainer of this binding?

> +
> +description: |+

What's up with the plus?

> + On MediaTek SoCs the PMIC is connected via SPMI and the controller allows
> + for multiple SoCs to control a single SPMI master.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: mediatek,mt6873-spmi
> +
> + reg:
> + minItems: 2
> + maxItems: 2
> +
> + reg-names:
> + items:
> + - const: "pmif"
> + - const: "spmimst"
> +
> + clocks:
> + minItems: 3
> + maxItems: 3
> +
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: "pmif_sys_ck"
> + - const: "pmif_tmr_ck"
> + - const: "spmimst_clk_mux"
> +
> + assigned-clocks:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + assigned-clock-parents:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - reg-names

Is reg-names really required?

> + - clocks
> + - clock-names

I think we need additionalProperties: False here

> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/mt8192-clk.h>
> +
> + spmi: spmi@10027000 {
> + compatible = "mediatek,mt6873-spmi";
> + reg = <0 0x10027000 0 0x000e00>,
> + <0 0x10029000 0 0x000100>;

I think we can drop the two cells and just have one cell binding here?

> + reg-names = "pmif", "spmimst";
> + clocks = <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_PMIC_AP>,
> + <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_PMIC_TMR>,
> + <&topckgen CLK_TOP_SPMI_MST_SEL>;
> + clock-names = "pmif_sys_ck",
> + "pmif_tmr_ck",
> + "spmimst_clk_mux";
> + assigned-clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_PWRAP_ULPOSC_SEL>;
> + assigned-clock-parents = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_OSC_D10>;
> + };
> +...

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-13 09:26    [W:0.055 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site