lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 seccomp 3/5] x86: Enable seccomp architecture tracking
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 12:25 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
> Is the idea that any syscall that's out of range for this (e.g. all of
> the x32 syscalls) is unoptimized? I'm okay with this, but I think it
> could use a comment.

Yes, any syscall number that is out of range is unoptimized. Where do
you think I should put a comment? seccomp_cache_check_allow_bitmap
above `if (unlikely(syscall_nr < 0 || syscall_nr >= bitmap_size))`,
with something like "any syscall number out of range is unoptimized"?

YiFei Zhu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-10-09 20:34    [W:0.057 / U:2.336 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site