lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] MIPS: replace add_memory_region with memblock
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 06:20:06PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > fixed missing memblock include in fw/sni/sniprom.c
> > tested on cobalt, IP22, IP28, IP30, IP32, JAZZ, SNI
>
> ...
>
> > diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/prom.c b/arch/mips/kernel/prom.c
> > index 9e50dc8df2f6..fab532cb5a11 100644
> > --- a/arch/mips/kernel/prom.c
> > +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/prom.c
> > @@ -50,14 +50,18 @@ void __init early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
> > size = PHYS_ADDR_MAX - base;
> > }
> >
> > - add_memory_region(base, size, BOOT_MEM_RAM);
> > + memblock_add(base, size);
> > }
> >
> > int __init early_init_dt_reserve_memory_arch(phys_addr_t base,
> > phys_addr_t size, bool nomap)
> > {
> > - add_memory_region(base, size,
> > - nomap ? BOOT_MEM_NOMAP : BOOT_MEM_RESERVED);
> > + if (nomap) {
> > + memblock_remove(base, size);
> > + } else {
> > + memblock_add(base, size);
> > + memblock_reserve(base, size);
> > + }
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> I guess originally the arch-specific early_init_dt_add_memory_arch() and
> early_init_dt_reserve_memory_arch() methods have been added since MIPS's got its
> own memory types declarations (BOOT_MEM_RAM, BOOT_MEM_RESERVED, etc) and had had
> a specific internal system memory regions mapping (add_memory_region(),
> boot_mem_map, etc). Since the leftover of that framework is going to be removed,
> we can freely use the standard early_init_dt_add_memory_arch() and
> early_init_dt_reserve_memory_arch() implementations from drivers/of/fdt.c:1102
> drivers/of/fdt.c:1149 .

perfect, I'll remove it in my next version.

> > @@ -426,13 +387,14 @@ static int __init early_parse_memmap(char *p)
> >
> > if (*p == '@') {
> > start_at = memparse(p+1, &p);
> > - add_memory_region(start_at, mem_size, BOOT_MEM_RAM);
> > + memblock_add(start_at, mem_size);
> > } else if (*p == '#') {
> > pr_err("\"memmap=nn#ss\" (force ACPI data) invalid on MIPS\n");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > } else if (*p == '$') {
> > start_at = memparse(p+1, &p);
>
> > - add_memory_region(start_at, mem_size, BOOT_MEM_RESERVED);
> > + memblock_add(start_at, mem_size);
> > + memblock_reserve(start_at, mem_size);
>
> I suppose we could remove the memory addition from here too. What do you think?

I'm not sure about that, add_memory_region() did a memblock_add
and then memblock_reserve for BOOT_MEM_RESERVED, that's why I changed
it that way.

Thomas.

--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-10-09 14:52    [W:0.106 / U:0.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site