Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH V8 1/5] PCI: Add defines for Designated Vendor-Specific Extended Capability | From | Hans de Goede <> | Date | Wed, 7 Oct 2020 23:36:26 +0200 |
| |
Hi,
On 10/7/20 8:54 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 06 Oct 2020, David E. Box wrote: > >> On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 19:51 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 03:45:54PM -0700, David E. Box wrote: >>>> Hi Bjorn, >>>> >>>> This patch has been acked and unchanged for weeks. Is it possible >>>> to >>>> get this pulled into next? We have SIOV and CXL related work that >>>> is >>>> using these definitions. Thanks. >>> >>> I acked it because I expected you to merge it along with the rest of >>> the series. >>> >>> I guess I could merge this patch via the PCI tree if you really want, >>> but that ends up being a hassle because we have to worry about which >>> order things get merged to Linus' tree. Better if the whole series >>> is >>> merged via the same tree. >> >> Agreed. The hope is that this series is ready for the next merge window >> but no ack yet on V8. And if the series does not make it I'd like this >> patch to at least get in. > > If Bjorn is happy to take this patch so late in the release cycle then > please go ahead. The other patches are due for v5.11.
I agree (that the other patches are for 5.11) talking about merging this series patch 2 is a mfd patch and patches 3-5 are drivers/platform/x86 patches.
Lee, FYI I'm taking over drivers/platform/x86 maintainership from Andy.
I suggest that we merge the entire series through a single tree (with acks or reviewed-by-s from the other maintainer) either through the mfd tree or through the drivers/platform/x86 tree. Since most changes are in drivers/platform/x86 the latter probably makes more sense, but either way works for me. So how would you like to proceed with this series ?
Regards,
Hans
| |