| Date | Wed, 7 Oct 2020 15:43:23 +0200 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 02/12] samples: configfs: order includes alphabetically |
| |
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 02:45:16PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> > > The preferred coding style is to order all includes alphabetically for > improved readability. There's no need for the configfs header to come > last.
Is it? People seem to have all kinds of weird opinions, but I don't think any ordering really makes sense. What does make sense it dropping the pointless empty line, so I've folded that into the next patch.
|