[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 00/30] 1GB PUD THP support on x86_64
On 2 Oct 2020, at 3:50, David Hildenbrand wrote:

>>>> - huge page sizes controllable by the userspace?
>>> It might be good to allow advanced users to choose the page sizes, so they
>>> have better control of their applications.
>> Could you elaborate more? Those advanced users can use hugetlb, right?
>> They get a very good control over page size and pool preallocation etc.
>> So they can get what they need - assuming there is enough memory.
> I am still not convinced that 1G THP (TGP :) ) are really what we want
> to support. I can understand that there are some use cases that might
> benefit from it, especially:
> "I want a lot of memory, give me memory in any granularity you have, I
> absolutely don't care - but of course, more TGP might be good for
> performance." Say, you want a 5GB region, but only have a single 1GB
> hugepage lying around. hugetlbfs allocation will fail.
> But then, do we really want to optimize for such (very special?) use
> cases via " 58 files changed, 2396 insertions(+), 460 deletions(-)" ?

I am planning to further refactor my code to reduce the size and make
it more general to support any size of THPs. As Matthew’s patchset[1]
is removing kernel’s THP size assumption, it might be a good time to
make THP support more general.

> I think gigantic pages are a sparse resource. Only selected applications
> *really* depend on them and benefit from them. Let these special
> applications handle it explicitly.
> Can we have a summary of use cases that would really benefit from this
> change?

For large machine learning applications, 1GB pages give good performance boost[2].
NVIDIA DGX A100 box now has 1TB memory, which means 1GB pages are not
that sparse in GPU-equipped infrastructure[3].

In addition, @Roman Gushchin should be able to provide a more concrete
story from his side.


Best Regards,
Yan Zi
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-10-05 17:34    [W:0.094 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site