lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/15] iio: accel: remove unnecessary CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 22:34:10 +0800
Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 07:06:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 4:42 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> wrote:
> >> On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:48:56 +0800
> >> Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Please put a cover letter on your next series explaining the context.
> >> In this particular case some of the replies you have gotten are
> >> general at it is a lot easier to find these sorts of things via
> >> replying to the cover letter.
> >
> >Looking at the number of duplicate messages I would suggest that one
> >needs to go through documentation on how to use git format-patch and
> >git send-email.
> >
>
> Thank you for the suggestion! Actually it's a tree-wide change and it
> seems the kernel community prefer individual patches or series for
> subsystems having the same maintainer over a huge patch set so I wrote
> some scripts to automate the process. That's why you see ~50 emails
> with almost the same commit message. The only difference of these
> commit messages is the name of PM macro.

When doing a bit set like this, it's worth sending out a small subset
first to shake out issue like those seen here.

Once those get merged then send out out the reset.

Thanks,

Jonathan

>
> >--
> >With Best Regards,
> >Andy Shevchenko
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Coiby

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-10-31 12:05    [W:0.053 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site