lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v11 00/10] NTFS read-write driver GPL implementation by Paragon Software
Hello!

On Friday 30 October 2020 18:02:29 Konstantin Komarov wrote:
> 27 files changed, 28364 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/filesystems/ntfs3.rst
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/Makefile
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/attrib.c
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/attrlist.c
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/bitfunc.c
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/bitmap.c
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/debug.h
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/dir.c
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/file.c
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/frecord.c
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/fslog.c
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/fsntfs.c
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/index.c
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/inode.c
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/lznt.c
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/namei.c
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/ntfs.h
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/ntfs_fs.h
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/record.c
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/run.c
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/super.c
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/upcase.c
> create mode 100644 fs/ntfs3/xattr.c

I would like to open discussion about two ntfs kernel drivers. Do we
really need two drivers (one read only - current version and one
read/write - this new version)?

What other people think?

I remember that Christoph (added to loop) had in past a good argument
about old staging exfat driver (it had support also for fat32/vfat),
that it would cause problems if two filesystem drivers would provide
support for same filesystem.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-10-30 17:42    [W:0.168 / U:0.360 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site