Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Oct 2020 09:51:27 +0100 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] seqlock: avoid -Wshadow warnings |
| |
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:34:10AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 5:58 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 05:50:38PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > - unsigned seq; \ > > > + unsigned __seq; \ > > > > > - unsigned seq = __read_seqcount_begin(s); \ > > > + unsigned _seq = __read_seqcount_begin(s); \ > > > > > - unsigned seq = __seqcount_sequence(s); \ > > > + unsigned __seq = __seqcount_sequence(s); \ > > > > Can we have a consistent number of leading '_' ? > > Not really ;-)
Duh.. ok, I'll take it as is.
| |