lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRE: [PATCH V3 2/4] misc: vop: do not allocate and reassign the used ring
    Date
    Hi Sudeep & Ashutosh & Vincent,

    Can you help test the patch about removing the codes of reassign used ring, and comment on the impact for Intel MIC platform?
    Thanks for any help.

    Best regards
    Sherry

    > Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] misc: vop: do not allocate and reassign the used
    > ring
    >
    > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 03:04:45AM +0000, Sherry Sun wrote:
    > > Hi Greg & Christoph,
    > >
    > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/4] misc: vop: do not allocate and reassign
    > > > the used ring
    > > >
    > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 01:06:36PM +0800, Sherry Sun wrote:
    > > > > We don't need to allocate and reassign the used ring here and
    > > > > remove the used_address_updated flag.Since RC has allocated the
    > > > > entire vring, including the used ring. Simply add the
    > > > > corresponding offset can get the used ring address.
    > > >
    > > > Someone needs to verify this vs the existing intel implementations.
    > >
    > > Hi Greg, @gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, sorry I don't have the Intel MIC
    > devices so cannot test it, do you know anyone who can help test this patch
    > changes on the Intel MIC platform? Thanks.
    >
    > Why not ask the authors/maintainers of that code?
    >
    > greg k-h

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2020-10-27 08:06    [W:2.478 / U:0.184 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site