lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 5/6] can: ctucanfd: CTU CAN FD open-source IP core - platform/SoC support.
Date
Hello Pavel,

thanks for review.

On Thursday 22 of October 2020 13:43:06 Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/ctucanfd/Kconfig
> > @@ -21,4 +21,15 @@ config CAN_CTUCANFD_PCI
> > PCIe board with PiKRON.com designed transceiver riser shield is
> > available at https://gitlab.fel.cvut.cz/canbus/pcie-ctu_can_fd .
> >
> > +config CAN_CTUCANFD_PLATFORM
> > + tristate "CTU CAN-FD IP core platform (FPGA, SoC) driver"
> > + depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
> > + help
>
> This is likely wrong, as it can enable config of CAN_CTUCANFD=M,
> CAN_CTUCANFD_PLATFORM=y, right?

My original code has not || COMPILE_TEST alternative.

But I have been asked to add it

On Sunday 16 of August 2020 01:28:13 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Can this be
> depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
> ?

I have send discussion later that I am not sure if it is right
but followed suggestion. If there is no other reply now,
I would drop || COMPILE_TEST. I believe that then it is correct
for regular use. I ma not sure about all consequences of COMPILE_TEST
missing.

> > @@ -8,3 +8,6 @@ ctucanfd-y := ctu_can_fd.o ctu_can_fd_hw.o
> >
> > obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_CTUCANFD_PCI) += ctucanfd_pci.o
> > ctucanfd_pci-y := ctu_can_fd_pci.o
> > +
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_CAN_CTUCANFD_PLATFORM) += ctucanfd_platform.o
> > +ctucanfd_platform-y += ctu_can_fd_platform.o
>
> Can you simply add right object files directly?

This is more tough question. We have kept sources
as ctu_can_fd.c, ctu_can_fd_hw.c etc. to produce
final ctucanfd.ko which matches device tree entry etc.
after name simplification now...
So we move from underscores to ctucanfd on more places.
So yes, we can rename ctu_can_fd.c to ctucanfd_drv.c + others
keep final ctucanfd.ko and change to single file based objects
ctucanfd_platform.c and ctucanfd_pci.c

If you think that it worth to be redone, I would do that.
It would disrupt sources history, may it be blames, merging
etc... but I would invest effort into it if asked for.

Best wishes,
Pavel

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-10-22 18:09    [W:0.049 / U:0.380 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site