Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch V2 13/13] usb: atm: Replace in_interrupt() usage in comment | From | Duncan Sands <> | Date | Mon, 19 Oct 2020 12:28:33 +0200 |
| |
On 10/19/20 12:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > in_interrupt() is a pretty vague context description as it means: hard > interrupt, soft interrupt or bottom half disabled regions. > > Replace the vague comment with a proper reasoning why spin_lock_irqsave() > needs to be used. > > Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@linutronix.de> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > Cc: Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@free.fr> > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org > > --- > drivers/usb/atm/usbatm.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > --- a/drivers/usb/atm/usbatm.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/atm/usbatm.c > @@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ static void usbatm_complete(struct urb * > /* vdbg("%s: urb 0x%p, status %d, actual_length %d", > __func__, urb, status, urb->actual_length); */ > > - /* usually in_interrupt(), but not always */ > + /* Can be invoked from task context, protect against interrupts */ > spin_lock_irqsave(&channel->lock, flags); > > /* must add to the back when receiving; doesn't matter when sending */ >
Signed-off-by: Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@free.fr>
| |