Messages in this thread | | | From | Joel Stanley <> | Date | Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:57:03 +0000 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] net: ftgmac100: Fix missing TX-poll issue |
| |
On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 07:39, Dylan Hung <dylan_hung@aspeedtech.com> wrote: > > The cpu accesses the register and the memory via different bus/path on > aspeed soc. So we can not guarantee that the tx-poll command
Just the 2600, or other versions too?
> (register access) is always behind the tx descriptor (memory). In other > words, the HW may start working even the data is not yet ready. By
even if the
> adding a dummy read after the last data write, we can ensure the data > are pushed to the memory, then guarantee the processing sequence > > Signed-off-by: Dylan Hung <dylan_hung@aspeedtech.com> > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c > index 00024dd41147..9a99a87f29f3 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftgmac100.c > @@ -804,7 +804,8 @@ static netdev_tx_t ftgmac100_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, > * before setting the OWN bit on the first descriptor. > */ > dma_wmb(); > - first->txdes0 = cpu_to_le32(f_ctl_stat); > + WRITE_ONCE(first->txdes0, cpu_to_le32(f_ctl_stat)); > + READ_ONCE(first->txdes0);
I understand what you're trying to do here, but I'm not sure that this is the correct way to go about it.
It does cause the compiler to produce a store and then a load.
> > /* Update next TX pointer */ > priv->tx_pointer = pointer; > -- > 2.17.1 >
| |