lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 11/11] soc: ti: k3-socinfo: Add entry for AM64 SoC family
From
Date
Hi Grygorii,

On 30/09/2020 16.56, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
>
> On 28/09/2020 11:34, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> It's JTAG PARTNO is 0xBB38.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
>> index bbbc2d2b7091..a14ec68846dd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/k3-socinfo.c
>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ static const struct k3_soc_id {
>>       { 0xBB5A, "AM65X" },
>>       { 0xBB64, "J721E" },
>>       { 0xBB6D, "J7200" },
>> +    { 0xBB38, "AM64" }
>
> Shouldn't it be AM64X

Good point, I'll fix this up and then the DMA series.

While here, what do you think: should we keep the DMA compatibles as I
have them in v1 (am64-dmss-bcdma and am64-dmss-pktdma):
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200930091412.8020-10-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200930091412.8020-11-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com/

or change them to am64x-dmss-* ?

I'll ask Rob on the binding doc patches as well.

>
>>   };
>>     static int
>>
>

- Péter

Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-10-01 08:42    [W:0.084 / U:7.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site