Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | [PATCH net-next 23/23] rxrpc: rxkad: Don't use pskb_pull() to advance through the response packet | From | David Howells <> | Date | Thu, 01 Oct 2020 15:59:24 +0100 |
| |
In the rxkad security class, don't use pskb_pull() to advance through the contents of the response packet. There's no point, especially as the next and last access to the skbuff still has to allow for the wire header in the offset (which we didn't advance over).
Better to just add the displacement to the next offset.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> ---
net/rxrpc/rxkad.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c b/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c index f3182edfcbae..e5b4bbdd0f34 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c +++ b/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c @@ -1162,8 +1162,6 @@ static int rxkad_verify_response(struct rxrpc_connection *conn, if (skb_copy_bits(skb, sizeof(struct rxrpc_wire_header), response, sizeof(*response)) < 0) goto protocol_error; - if (!pskb_pull(skb, sizeof(*response))) - BUG(); version = ntohl(response->version); ticket_len = ntohl(response->ticket_len); @@ -1194,7 +1192,7 @@ static int rxkad_verify_response(struct rxrpc_connection *conn, eproto = tracepoint_string("rxkad_tkt_short"); abort_code = RXKADPACKETSHORT; - if (skb_copy_bits(skb, sizeof(struct rxrpc_wire_header), + if (skb_copy_bits(skb, sizeof(struct rxrpc_wire_header) + sizeof(*response), ticket, ticket_len) < 0) goto protocol_error_free;
| |