lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v11 1/8] PCI/ERR: Update error status after reset_link()
On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 04:14:09PM -0800, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> On 1/3/20 6:54 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 05:03:03PM -0800, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> > > On 1/3/20 4:34 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2019 at 04:39:07PM -0800, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > > > > From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > Commit bdb5ac85777d ("PCI/ERR: Handle fatal error recovery") uses
> > > > > reset_link() to recover from fatal errors. But, if the reset is
> > > > > successful there is no need to continue the rest of the error recovery
> > > > > checks. Also, during fatal error recovery, if the initial value of error
> > > > > status is PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT or PCI_ERS_RESULT_NO_AER_DRIVER then
> > > > > even after successful recovery (using reset_link()) pcie_do_recovery()
> > > > > will report the recovery result as failure. So update the status of
> > > > > error after reset_link().
> > > > I like the part about updating "status" with the result of
> > > > reset_link(), and I split that into its own patch because it
> > > > seems like a fix that *can* be separated.
> > > >
> > > > But I'm not convinced that we should skip the ->slot_reset()
> > > > callbacks if the reset_link() was successful.
> > > If reset_link() call is successful then the result value will be
> > > "PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED". So even if you proceed with
> > > rest of the code, slot_reset() will never get called right ?
> > The current code:
> >
> > if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen &&
> > reset_link(dev, service) != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED)
> > goto failed;
> > ...
> > if (status == PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET) {
> > status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
> > pci_walk_bus(bus, report_slot_reset, &status);
> >
> > doesn't save the result of reset_link(), so if status was
> > PCI_ERS_RESULT_NEED_RESET and the reset succeeds, we will call
> > ->slot_reset().
> >
> > After your patch, if "state == pci_channel_io_frozen", we *never* call
> > ->slot_reset().
> >
> > Do you think that matches pci-error-recovery.rst? It doesn't seem
> > like it to me, but perhaps I haven't read it closely enough.
> Documentation does not have clear details on what to do with return
> value of reset_link() (step 3). But IMO, if step 3 recovers the device and
> returns PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED then there is no need to proceed
> to slot reset (step 4). May be we should update the Documentation?

Are you suggesting we don't need to call a driver callback after
resetting the device? Note that the ->slot_reset() doesn't *perform*
a reset; it is called *after* completion of a reset.

The doc says:

... Upon completion of slot reset, the platform will call the device
slot_reset() callback.
...
This call gives drivers the chance to re-initialize the hardware
(re-download firmware, etc.). At this point, the driver may assume
that the card is in a fresh state and is fully functional. The slot
is unfrozen and the driver has full access to PCI config space,
memory mapped I/O space and DMA. Interrupts (Legacy, MSI, or MSI-X)
will also be available.

After we reset a device, the driver certainly needs a chance to
reinitialize it.

> > > > According to
> > > > Documentation/PCI/pci-error-recovery.rst, we should call
> > > > ->slot_reset() after completion of the reset.
> > > >
> > > > For example, rsxx_err_handler implements ->slot_reset(), but
> > > > not ->resume(). If we reset the device, we'll claim success and
> > > > return, but we won't call rsxx_slot_reset(), which does a bunch
> > > > of important-looking recovery stuff.
> > > >
> > > > If pci-error-recovery.rst is wrong, we should fix that (after
> > > > auditing all the drivers to make sure they match).
> > > >
> > > > > Fixes: bdb5ac85777d ("PCI/ERR: Handle fatal error recovery")
> > > > > Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
> > > > > Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > Acked-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/pci/pcie/err.c | 10 +++++++---
> > > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> > > > > index b0e6048a9208..53cd9200ec2c 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/err.c
> > > > > @@ -204,9 +204,12 @@ void pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev, enum pci_channel_state state,
> > > > > else
> > > > > pci_walk_bus(bus, report_normal_detected, &status);
> > > > > - if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen &&
> > > > > - reset_link(dev, service) != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED)
> > > > > - goto failed;
> > > > > + if (state == pci_channel_io_frozen) {
> > > > > + status = reset_link(dev, service);
> > > > > + if (status != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED)
> > > > > + goto failed;
> > > > > + goto done;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > if (status == PCI_ERS_RESULT_CAN_RECOVER) {
> > > > > status = PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED;
> > > > > @@ -228,6 +231,7 @@ void pcie_do_recovery(struct pci_dev *dev, enum pci_channel_state state,
> > > > > if (status != PCI_ERS_RESULT_RECOVERED)
> > > > > goto failed;
> > > > > +done:
> > > > > pci_dbg(dev, "broadcast resume message\n");
> > > > > pci_walk_bus(bus, report_resume, &status);
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.21.0
> > > > >
> > > --
> > > Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
> > > Linux kernel developer
> > >
> --
> Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
> Linux kernel developer
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-10 00:26    [W:0.076 / U:3.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site