lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mfd: motorola-cpcap: Do not hardcode SPI mode flags
* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [200107 18:24]:
> * Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> [200107 09:58]:
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 6:04 PM Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> >
> > > * Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> [700101 00:00]:
> > > > The current use of mode flags to us SPI_MODE_0 and
> > > > SPI_CS_HIGH is fragile: it overwrites anything already
> > > > assigned by the SPI core. Change it thusly:
> > > >
> > > > - Just |= the SPI_MODE_0 so we keep other flags
> > > > - Assign ^= SPI_CS_HIGH since we might be active high
> > > > already, and that is usually the case with GPIOs used
> > > > for chip select, even if they are in practice active low.
> > > >
> > > > Add a comment clarifying why ^= SPI_CS_HIGH is the right
> > > > choice here.
> > >
> > > Looks like this breaks booting for droid4 with a cpcap
> > > PMIC, probably as regulators won't work. There's no GPIO
> > > controller involved in this case for the chip select, the
> > > pins are directly controlled by the spi-omap2-mcspi.c
> > > driver.
> > >
> > > From the pin muxing setup we see there's a pull-down on
> > > mcspi1_cs0 pin meaning it's active high:
> > >
> > > /* 0x4a100138 mcspi1_cs0.mcspi1_cs0 ae23 */
> > > OMAP4_IOPAD(0x138, PIN_INPUT_PULLDOWN | MUX_MODE0)
> > >
> > > My guess a similar issue is with similar patches for
> > > all non-gpio spi controllers?
> > >
> > > Let me know if you want me to test some other changes,
> > > or if this patch depends on some other changes.
> >
> > So this must mean that something else is setting SPI_CS_HIGH
> > for this driver, such as the device tree, right?
>
> Hmm yes we have "spi-cs-high" property set in the dts.
>
> But looking at drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c, it also
> provides an option to use a GPIO for chip select in
> omap2_mcspi_setup(). That does not seem to be used though
> based on a quick grep though.
>
> > And the |= SPI_CS_HIGH assignment in the driver is just
> > surplus and we should just delete this code instead.
> >
> > Would that be right?
>
> Sorry I don't know, maybe. If you have some test patch to
> try I can easily test.

Oh sorry, I guess you're suggesting we drop SPI_CS_HIGH from
drivers/mfd/motorola-cpcap.c, and not from spi-omap2-mcspi.c..
Too much glög over the holidays probably :)

Anyways, removing SPI_CS_HIGH motorola-cpcap.c also causes
mounting MMC to fail looks like. I wonder if we're missing
of_property_read_bool() for spi-cs-high in spi-omap2-mcspi.c?

Regards,

Tony

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-07 19:38    [W:0.048 / U:5.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site