lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: bd718x7: Yamlify and add BD71850
On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 7:01 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Dec 2019, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
>
> > Convert ROHM bd71837 and bd71847 PMIC binding text docs to yaml. Split
> > the binding document to two separate documents (own documents for BD71837
> > and BD71847) as they have different amount of regulators. This way we can
> > better enforce the node name check for regulators. ROHM is also providing
> > BD71850 - which is almost identical to BD71847 - main difference is some
> > initial regulator states. The BD71850 can be driven by same driver and it
> > has same buck/LDO setup as BD71847 - add it to BD71847 binding document and
> > introduce compatible for it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
> > ---
> >
> > changes since v1:
> > - constrains to short and long presses.
> > - reworded commit message to shorten a line exceeding 75 chars
> > - added 'additionalProperties: false'
> > - removed 'clock-names' from example node
> >
> > .../bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71837-pmic.txt | 90 -------
> > .../bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71837-pmic.yaml | 236 ++++++++++++++++++
> > .../bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71847-pmic.yaml | 222 ++++++++++++++++
> > .../regulator/rohm,bd71837-regulator.txt | 162 ------------
> > .../regulator/rohm,bd71837-regulator.yaml | 103 ++++++++
> > .../regulator/rohm,bd71847-regulator.yaml | 97 +++++++
>
> Can you split these out per-subsystem, so that I can apply the MFD
> changes please?

That's not going to work any more. The MFD binding references the
child bindings and the complete example(s) resides in the MFD binding.

Rob

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-07 16:38    [W:0.090 / U:60.480 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site