lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add A618 gpu dt blob
Hi,

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 4:04 AM Sharat Masetty <smasetty@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> + adreno_smmu: iommu@5040000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,sc7180-smmu-v2", "qcom,smmu-v2";
> + reg = <0 0x05040000 0 0x10000>;
> + #iommu-cells = <1>;
> + #global-interrupts = <2>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 229 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 231 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 364 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> + <GIC_SPI 365 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> + <GIC_SPI 366 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> + <GIC_SPI 367 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> + <GIC_SPI 368 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> + <GIC_SPI 369 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> + <GIC_SPI 370 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> + <GIC_SPI 371 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_GPU_MEMNOC_GFX_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_GPU_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_DDRSS_GPU_AXI_CLK>;
> +
> + clock-names = "bus", "iface", "mem_iface_clk";

Repeated comment from v2 feedback:

Please send a patch to:

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml

...adding 'qcom,sc7180-smmu-v2'. If you do this it will point out
that you've added a new clock: "mem_iface_clk". Is this truly a new
clock in sc7180 compared to previous IOMMUs? ...or is it not really
needed?


> + gmu: gmu@506a000 {
> + compatible="qcom,adreno-gmu-618.0", "qcom,adreno-gmu";
> + reg = <0 0x0506a000 0 0x31000>, <0 0x0b290000 0 0x10000>,
> + <0 0x0b490000 0 0x10000>;
> + reg-names = "gmu", "gmu_pdc", "gmu_pdc_seq";
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 304 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 305 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + interrupt-names = "hfi", "gmu";
> + clocks = <&gpucc GPU_CC_CX_GMU_CLK>,
> + <&gpucc GPU_CC_CXO_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_DDRSS_GPU_AXI_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_GPU_MEMNOC_GFX_CLK>;
> + clock-names = "gmu", "cxo", "axi", "memnoc";
> + power-domains = <&gpucc CX_GDSC>;
> + power-domain-names = "cx";

As per continued comments on v2, please see if this works for you:

power-domains = <&gpucc CX_GDSC>, <0>;
power-domain-names = "cx", "gx";

...and work to get something more real for "gx" ASAP. It did seem to
boot for me and (unless someone disagrees) it seems better than
totally leaving it out / violating the bindings?


-Doug

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-31 22:44    [W:0.066 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site