lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 11/14] dmaengine: tegra-apb: Clean up suspend-resume
From
Date
28.01.2020 17:10, Jon Hunter пишет:
>
> On 21/01/2020 21:23, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 12.01.2020 20:30, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>>> It is enough to check whether hardware is busy on suspend and to reset
>>> it across of suspend-resume because channel's configuration is fully
>>> re-programmed on each DMA transaction anyways and because save-restore
>>> of an active channel won't end up well without pausing transfer prior to
>>> saving of the state (note that all channels shall be idling at the time of
>>> suspend, so save-restore is not needed at all).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c b/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c
>>> index b9d8e57eaf54..398a0e1d6506 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c
>>> @@ -1392,6 +1392,36 @@ static const struct tegra_dma_chip_data tegra148_dma_chip_data = {
>>> .support_separate_wcount_reg = true,
>>> };
>>>
>>> +static int tegra_dma_init_hw(struct tegra_dma *tdma)
>>> +{
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + err = reset_control_assert(tdma->rst);
>>> + if (err) {
>>> + dev_err(tdma->dev, "failed to assert reset: %d\n", err);
>>> + return err;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + err = clk_enable(tdma->dma_clk);
>>> + if (err) {
>>> + dev_err(tdma->dev, "failed to enable clk: %d\n", err);
>>> + return err;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* reset DMA controller */
>>> + udelay(2);
>>> + reset_control_deassert(tdma->rst);
>>> +
>>> + /* enable global DMA registers */
>>> + tdma_write(tdma, TEGRA_APBDMA_GENERAL, TEGRA_APBDMA_GENERAL_ENABLE);
>>> + tdma_write(tdma, TEGRA_APBDMA_CONTROL, 0);
>>> + tdma_write(tdma, TEGRA_APBDMA_IRQ_MASK_SET, 0xFFFFFFFF);
>>> +
>>> + clk_disable(tdma->dma_clk);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int tegra_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> {
>>> const struct tegra_dma_chip_data *cdata;
>>> @@ -1433,30 +1463,18 @@ static int tegra_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> if (ret)
>>> return ret;
>>>
>>> + ret = tegra_dma_init_hw(tdma);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + goto err_clk_unprepare;
>>> +
>>> pm_runtime_irq_safe(&pdev->dev);
>>> pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>>> if (!pm_runtime_enabled(&pdev->dev)) {
>>> ret = tegra_dma_runtime_resume(&pdev->dev);
>>> if (ret)
>>> goto err_clk_unprepare;
>>
>> Jon, but isn't the RPM mandatory for all Tegra SoCs now and thus
>> guaranteed to be enabled? Maybe we should start to remove handling the
>> case of unavailable RPM from all Tegra drivers?
>
> Yes that's true, even ARCH_TEGRA selects PM now

I already sent out v5 with the !RPM handling removed from the code,
please take a look at it.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-28 15:54    [W:0.086 / U:20.932 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site