lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] dt-bindings: fix warnings in validation of qcom,gcc.yaml
Date
The last example in qcom,gcc.yaml set 'sleep' as the second
value of 'clock-names'. According to the schema is should
be 'sleep_clk'. Fix the example to conform the schema.
This fixes a warning when validating the schema:
"clock-names: ... is not valid under any of the given schemas"

Signed-off-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@collabora.com>
---
I tested this patch on top of the patch
"dt-binding: fix compilation error of the example in qcom,gcc.yaml"
which fixes a compilation error in this file

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml
index 50ff07f80acb..cac1150c9292 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ examples:
<0>,
<0>;
clock-names = "xo",
- "sleep",
+ "sleep_clk",
"usb3_pipe",
"ufs_rx_symbol0",
"ufs_rx_symbol1",
--
2.17.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-22 14:58    [W:0.053 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site