lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH ghak28 V4] audit: log audit netlink multicast bind and unbind events
On 2020-01-22 18:12, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 22, 2020 5:40:10 PM EST Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 3:21 PM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Log information about programs connecting to and disconnecting from the
> > > audit netlink multicast socket. This is needed so that during
> > > investigations a security officer can tell who or what had access to the
> > > audit trail. This helps to meet the FAU_SAR.2 requirement for Common
> > > Criteria. Here is the systemd startup event:
> > >
> > > type=UNKNOWN[1335] msg=audit(2020-01-17 10:30:33.731:6) : pid=1 uid=root
> > > auid=unset tty=(none) ses=unset subj=kernel comm=systemd
> > > exe=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd nl-mcgrp=1 op=connect res=yes
> > >
> > > And the events from the test suite:
> > >
> > > type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(2020-01-17 10:36:24.050:294) :
> > > proctitle=/usr/bin/perl -w amcast_joinpart/test type=SOCKADDR
> > > msg=audit(2020-01-17 10:36:24.050:294) : saddr={ saddr_fam=netlink
> > > nlnk-fam=16 nlnk-pid=0 } type=SYSCALL msg=audit(2020-01-17
> > > 10:36:24.050:294) : arch=x86_64 syscall=bind success=yes exit=0 a0=0x7
> > > a1=0x55d65cb79090 a2=0xc a3=0x0 items=0 ppid=671 pid=674 auid=root
> > > uid=root gid=root euid=root suid=root fsuid=root egid=root sgid=root
> > > fsgid=root tty=ttyS0 ses=3 comm=perl exe=/usr/bin/perl
> > > subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null)
> > > type=UNKNOWN[1335] msg=audit(2020-01-17 10:36:24.050:294) : pid=674
> > > uid=root auid=root tty=ttyS0 ses=3
> > > subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 comm=perl
> > > exe=/usr/bin/perl nl-mcgrp=1 op=connect res=yes
> > >
> > > type=UNKNOWN[1335] msg=audit(2020-01-17 10:36:24.051:295) : pid=674
> > > uid=root auid=root tty=ttyS0 ses=3
> > > subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 comm=perl
> > > exe=/usr/bin/perl nl-mcgrp=1 op=disconnect res=yes>
> > > Please see the upstream issue tracker:
> > > https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/28
> > > https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/wiki/RFE-Audit-Multicast-So
> > > cket-Join-Part
> > > https://github.com/rgbriggs/audit-testsuite/compare/ghak28-mcast-part-> > join>
> > > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Note: msg type 1334 was skipped due to BPF accepted in another tree.
> > > Note: v5 due to previous 2014-10-07, 2015-07-23, 2016-11-30, 2017-10-13
> > > Note: subj attrs included due to missing syscall record for systemd
> > > (audit=1) Note: tried refactor of subj attrs, but this is yet another
> > > new order. ---
> > >
> > > include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 1 +
> > > kernel/audit.c | 48
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 45
> > > insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> > > index 3ad935527177..67fb24472dc2 100644
> > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/audit.h
> > > @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@
> > >
> > > #define AUDIT_FANOTIFY 1331 /* Fanotify access decision */
> > > #define AUDIT_TIME_INJOFFSET 1332 /* Timekeeping offset injected */
> > > #define AUDIT_TIME_ADJNTPVAL 1333 /* NTP value adjustment */
> > >
> > > +#define AUDIT_EVENT_LISTENER 1335 /* Task joined multicast read
> > > socket */>
> > > #define AUDIT_AVC 1400 /* SE Linux avc denial or grant
> > > */
> > > #define AUDIT_SELINUX_ERR 1401 /* Internal SE Linux Errors */
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c
> > > index 17b0d523afb3..478259f3fa53 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/audit.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/audit.c
> > > @@ -1520,20 +1520,60 @@ static void audit_receive(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > >
> > > audit_ctl_unlock();
> > >
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/* Log information about who is connecting to the audit multicast socket
> > > */ +static void audit_log_multicast_bind(int group, const char *op, int
> > > err) +{
> > > + const struct cred *cred;
> > > + struct tty_struct *tty;
> > > + char comm[sizeof(current->comm)];
> > > + struct audit_buffer *ab;
> > > +
> > > + if (!audit_enabled)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + ab = audit_log_start(audit_context(), GFP_KERNEL,
> > > AUDIT_EVENT_LISTENER); + if (!ab)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + cred = current_cred();
> > > + tty = audit_get_tty();
> > > + audit_log_format(ab, "pid=%u uid=%u auid=%u tty=%s ses=%u",
> > > + task_pid_nr(current),
> > > + from_kuid(&init_user_ns, cred->uid),
> > > + from_kuid(&init_user_ns,
> > > audit_get_loginuid(current)), + tty ?
> > > tty_name(tty) : "(none)",
> > > + audit_get_sessionid(current));
> >
> > Don't we already get all of that information as part of the syscall record?
>
> We don't want or need a syscall record. It doesn't add anything to the
> necessary information. Also, when we have syscall records, people expect that
> they obey the syscall auditing. Especially wrt "never" audit rules.

Did both of you see the 4 "Note:" lines between the description and the
patch? I'm caught in the middle here.

> > > + audit_put_tty(tty);
> > > + audit_log_task_context(ab); /* subj= */
> >
> > Also part of the syscall record.
> >
> > > + audit_log_format(ab, " comm=");
> > > + audit_log_untrustedstring(ab, get_task_comm(comm, current));
> >
> > Again.
> >
> > > + audit_log_d_path_exe(ab, current->mm); /* exe= */
> >
> > Again.
> >
> > > + audit_log_format(ab, " nl-mcgrp=%d op=%s res=%d", group, op,
> > > !err);
> > This part is new ;)
> >
> > > + audit_log_end(ab);
> > > +}
> >
> > I'm pretty sure these are the same arguments I made when Steve posted
> > a prior version of this patch.
>
> No. You didn't mind it then. What you objected to was that I wrote a helper
> function that could be used by future audit events to start a format
> standardization process.

Again, see the 4 notes. I was not able to refactor any of the subject
attributes since this is yet another audit subject attributes order
(YAASAO) that hasn't been seen yet. Why are we creatting YAASAO?

> The event looks good to me. Ack for the format being acceptable to existing
> tools.
>
> -Steve

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-23 00:46    [W:0.074 / U:0.160 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site