lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/6] fixes for atmel-hlcdc
On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Sam Ravnborg wrote:

> Hi Lee.
>
> How do de handle the two mfd related patches?
>
> > I have few fixes for atmel-hlcdc driver in this series as well
> > as two reverts.
> > Revert "drm: atmel-hlcdc: enable sys_clk during initalization." is
> > due to the fix in in patch 2/5.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Claudiu Beznea
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - changes dev_err() message in patch 4/6
> > - collect Acked-by tags
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - introduce patch 3/6
> > - use dev_err() inpatch 4/6
> > - introduce patch 5/6 instead of reverting commit f6f7ad323461
> > ("drm/atmel-hlcdc: allow selecting a higher pixel-clock than requested")
> >
> > Claudiu Beznea (5):
> > drm: atmel-hlcdc: use double rate for pixel clock only if supported
> > drm: atmel-hlcdc: enable clock before configuring timing engine
>
> > mfd: atmel-hlcdc: add struct device member to struct
> > atmel_hlcdc_regmap
> > mfd: atmel-hlcdc: return in case of error
>
> Would it be OK to apply the to drm-misc-next, or shal they go in via
> your mfd tree?

How are they related to the other patches? Do they have build-time
dependencies on any of the other patches, or vice versa?

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-02 17:06    [W:0.128 / U:19.932 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site