lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS too low!
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 7:09 AM Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, I fully agree with this.
> If we calculate the subclass for lock_nested() very well, I think we
> might use static lockdep key for addr_list_lock_key too. I think
> "dev->upper_level" and "dev->lower_level" might be used as subclass.
> These values are updated recursively in master/nomaster operation.

Great! I will think about this too. At least I will remove the other keys
for net-next.

Thanks.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-18 21:42    [W:0.524 / U:0.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site