Messages in this thread | | | From | Cong Wang <> | Date | Sat, 18 Jan 2020 12:41:25 -0800 | Subject | Re: BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS too low! |
| |
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 7:09 AM Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I fully agree with this. > If we calculate the subclass for lock_nested() very well, I think we > might use static lockdep key for addr_list_lock_key too. I think > "dev->upper_level" and "dev->lower_level" might be used as subclass. > These values are updated recursively in master/nomaster operation.
Great! I will think about this too. At least I will remove the other keys for net-next.
Thanks.
| |