lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] arm64: Add KRYO{3,4}XX CPU cores to spectre-v2 safe list
Hi,

On 2020-01-16 23:57, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 8:11 AM Sai Prakash Ranjan
> <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Will,
>>
>> On 2020-01-16 21:02, Will Deacon wrote:
>> > [+Jeffrey]
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 07:49:12PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
>> >> KRYO3XX silver CPU cores and KRYO4XX silver, gold CPU cores
>> >> are not affected by Spectre variant 2. Add them to spectre_v2
>> >> safe list to correct ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 warning and
>> >> vulnerability sysfs value.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
>> >> ---
>> >> arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h | 6 ++++++
>> >> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 3 +++
>> >> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
>> >> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
>> >> index aca07c2f6e6e..7219cddeba66 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cputype.h
>> >> @@ -85,6 +85,9 @@
>> >> #define QCOM_CPU_PART_FALKOR_V1 0x800
>> >> #define QCOM_CPU_PART_FALKOR 0xC00
>> >> #define QCOM_CPU_PART_KRYO 0x200
>> >> +#define QCOM_CPU_PART_KRYO_3XX_SILVER 0x803
>> >> +#define QCOM_CPU_PART_KRYO_4XX_GOLD 0x804
>> >> +#define QCOM_CPU_PART_KRYO_4XX_SILVER 0x805
>> >
>> > Jeffrey is the only person I know who understands the CPU naming here,
>> > so
>> > I've added him in case this needs either renaming or extending to cover
>> > other CPUs. I wouldn't be at all surprised if we need a function call
>> > rather than a bunch of table entries...
>> >
>> > That said, the internet claims that KRYO4XX gold is based on
>> > Cortex-A76,
>> > and so CSV2 should be set...
>> >
>>
>> Yes the internet claims are true and CSV2 is set. SANITY check logs in
>> here show ID_PFR0_EL1 -
>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1138457/
>
> I'm probably just being a noob here and am confused, but if CSV2 is
> set then why do you need your patch at all? The code I see says that
> if CSV2 is set then we don't even check the spectre_v2_safe_list().
>

I am a noob here and didn't understand what Will meant ;). V2 posted
now.

Thanks,
Sai

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-16 21:05    [W:0.057 / U:0.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site