lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v4 00/19] Core scheduling v4
Date
On 1/14/20 7:43 PM, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2020/1/14 23:40, Vineeth Remanan Pillai wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 8:12 PM Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I also encountered kernel panic with the v4 code when taking cpu offline or online
>>> when core scheduler is running. I've refreshed the previous patch, along
>>> with 3 other patches to fix problems related to CPU online/offline.
>>>
>>> As a side effect of the fix, each core can now operate in core-scheduling
>>> mode or non core-scheduling mode, depending on how many online SMT threads it has.
>>>
>>> Vineet, are you guys planning to refresh v4 and update it to v5? Aubrey posted
>>> a port to the latest kernel earlier.
>>>
>> Thanks for the updated patch Tim.
>>
>> We have been testing with v4 rebased on 5.4.8 as RC kernels had given us
>> trouble in the past. v5 is due soon and we are planning to release v5 when
>> 5.5 comes out. As of now, v5 has your crash fixes and Aubrey's changes
>> related to load balancing.
>
> It turns out my load balancing related changes need to be refined.
> For example, we don't migrate task if the task's core cookie does not match
> with CPU's core cookie, but if the entire core is idle, we should allow task
> migration, something like the following:
>
> I plan to do this after my Chinese New Year holiday(Feb 3rd).
>
> Thanks,
> -Aubrey
>

Aubrey's attached patch should replace his previous patch
sched/fair: don't migrate task if cookie not match

I've also added a fix below for Aubrey's patch
sched/fair: find cookie matched idlest CPU.

Aubrey, can you merge this fix into that patch when you update
your patches?

Tim

---->8----
From 06c09a9c86db6a7c30e5ebca7a635005ac2df37b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 09:08:18 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Check core scheduler in use when comparing cookie

When scanning scheduler groups to find the idlest cpu for a task waking
up, cookie matching should not be considered if a target cpu doesn't
use core scheduling. Code introduced by patch

sched/fair: find cookie matched idlest CPU

matches cookie regardless of cpu's core scheduler state. Fix this.

Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a90179937f63..55e7b22522db 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5656,8 +5656,15 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p,
for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_span(group)) {
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(i);

- if (p->core_cookie == rq->core->core_cookie)
+ if (!sched_core_enabled(rq)) {
cookie_match = true;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (p->core_cookie == rq->core->core_cookie) {
+ cookie_match = true;
+ break;
+ }
}
/* Skip over this group if no cookie matched */
if (!cookie_match)
--
2.20.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-15 20:33    [W:0.125 / U:4.932 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site