[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Problems with determining data presence by examining extents?
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 09:10:44PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > That allows userspace to distinguish fe_physical addresses that may be
> > on different devices. This isn't in the kernel yet, since it is mostly
> > useful only for Btrfs and nobody has implemented it there. I can give
> > you details if working on this for Btrfs is of interest to you.
> IMHO it's not good enough.
> The concern is, one extent can exist on multiple devices (mirrors for
> RAID1/RAID10/RAID1C2/RAID1C3, or stripes for RAID5/6).
> I didn't see how it can be easily implemented even with extra fields.
> And even we implement it, it can be too complex or bug prune to fill
> per-device info.

It's also completely bogus for the use cases to start with. fiemap
is a debug tool reporting the file system layout. Using it for anything
related to actual data storage and data integrity is a receipe for
disaster. As said the right thing for the use case would be something
like the NFS READ_PLUS operation. If we can't get that easily it can
be emulated using lseek SEEK_DATA / SEEK_HOLE assuming no other thread
could be writing to the file, or the raciness doesn't matter.

 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-15 14:32    [W:0.113 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site